I just happened to come across a story in The Express which had the following title:
Anger as Labour MP tells Government: Let's keep accepting refugees until Britain BREAKSOk, we know the Labour Party faithful are as mad as badgers and The Express is prone to hysteria, so take this with a pinch of salt perhaps? No, she really did say it:
She told the gathering: "We need to shout so much more and say 20,000 is not enough, 30,000 is not enough.
"We will keep going until we hit our saturation point because what does it matter if we have to wait another week for a hospital visit?
"Or if our class sizes are slightly bigger; or if our city is slightly fuller?
"What does it matter if things are slightly more challenging?
"If we have to pay a little bit more into the system?Presumably, by ''more challenging'' she means ethnic cleansing and mass rape of the Natives, followed by complete dispossession. As GW at Majority Rights noted this woman is a religious nut:
"Surely it is worth it to see those lives being restored again."
The left-liberal mind has an excuse. It is religious in kind, and has little contact to or experience of normal people. In any normal age, such religios would be nuns and monks alone in their cells with a bible and some knotted cord, flagellating themselves to drive out sin and be blessed in virtue. In our time, though, they have learned a neat little trick whereby they don’t have to enter seclusion or even beat their own backs. They can beat the backs of their people, and the virtue will still be all theirs. And there is practically no limit to how much virtue they can accommodate:Quite.