Friday, 30 December 2016
You'd have to have a hard heart indeed not to be mildly moved by the poetic tragedy of Debbie Reynolds dying just a day after her daughter, Carrie Fisher. And just days before the passing of Carrie Fisher, George Michael's heart gave out one last time. A few days after Donald Trump was elected Leonard Cohen passed away prompting (((Jonathon Freedland))) to write in The Guardian ''Trump’s world is too dark – even for Leonard Cohen''. At the beginning of 2016 we lost Starman David Bowie and at the end we lost Star Wars's Princess Leia, and in-between the western political landscape was under a seemingly relentless populist revolt.
In the liberal mind, then, 2016 has become a by-word for defeat, misery, death and failure:
Tuesday, 27 December 2016
Friday, 23 December 2016
We Won This Year!
At the beginning of this year I wrote an article called ''Entering 2016:The Wars To Come'' 2015 had, of course, been the year of the refugee invasion which ran parallel to, and was directly responsible for, a series of barbaric Muslim terror attacks on Europeans. As we entered 2016 it was obvious that there would be yet more terror inflicted upon Europeans and that our traitor elites would show their usual contempt for our suffering which would position us, as reactionaries, into simply pointing out the howling insanity and evil of the people ultimately responsible.
And indeed, in 2016, 142 Europeans were slaughtered by Muslims, 1000's perhaps 10,000's of European women have been raped or sexual molested and the petty street violence and casual muggings will be equally eye-watering in number. For me personally, the image of the little girl in Nice wrapped in a tinfoil body-bag after being rundown by an Islamic nut in a truck perfectly encapsulated the betrayal of innocence taking place across the continent, I wrote about it in my ''No Country For Nice White Families'' post.
Wednesday, 21 December 2016
I was recently sent this post and asked if I'd put it on the blog to help keep the plight of Lawrence Burns in the public eye. As many readers will be aware, there's been a dramatic increase in the number of our people being locked up in recent weeks, and non of the cases are more baffling and troubling than that of Lawrence Burns.....
On Friday the 16th of December a young man by the name of Lawrence Burns was remanded in custody. What was his crime? What demonic, unforgivable evil did this young man commit? After all, the judge described the crime as ''serious'' and therefore he had no choice but to throw him prison – to take away his freedom right before Christmas – to send a message to the British public that this man's actions will no longer be tolerated in our liberal democracy.
His crime (?): Mr. Burns was remanded for ''inciting racial hatred'' – it is my intention in this article to articulate that his imprisonment is not a result of Mr. Burns' criminalality but of a sick, anti-White System that opresses any White person who stands up for the interests of their own people.
Saturday, 17 December 2016
“Scientists have often been baffled by the existence of spontaneous order in the universe. The laws of thermodynamics seem to dictate the opposite, that nature should inexorably degenerate toward a state of greater disorder, greater entropy. Yet all around us we see magnificent structures—galaxies, cells, ecosystems, human beings—that have all somehow managed to assemble themselves.”
I was recently clearing out some old junk when I happened to come across an old Playstation 2 and a couple of games. In a more innocent time I, like many other men, frittered away countless hours playing video games, but one of the games I rediscovered recently rekindled some old memories and when I caved in to temptation and hooked it up I could see why.
It goes without saying that this blog is not usually prone to exploring the world of games, especially games from 12 years ago which belong to a dead genre, but on replaying a game called R-type Final it occurred to me that what I was seeing was essentially the struggle which Nationalists find themselves in today, but on a deeper, 'meta' level.
Monday, 12 December 2016
This post is something of a sequel to my recent post on Kraut and Tea and a bookmark (for now) into my exploration of this new breed of leftist popping up on YouTube, the anarcho-libertarian-socialist-individualist-whatever else- gobshites creating eloquent but vitriolic 'content' about us, such as this guy:
I viewed the content, I understand the arguments, but I cannot for the life of me see why white men, particularly Germans! would be trying to sell this incoherent, paradoxical bullshit to the wider world. I watch this stuff and my mind is beset with questions.....
Thursday, 8 December 2016
Somebody posted a link in the comments this week (hat-tip Dandelo) to a Tweet and article written by a woman called Mary Engleheart, Mary's blog called ''Migration Diaries'' is an account of her pro-refugee activism and tales of derring-do from the front-lines in the Calais migrant jungle. Mary recently wrote an article entitled ''A shout out to the men of fighting age'' it's Mary attempting to refute and debunk the ''men of fighting age'' headline which has become something of a meme.
The problem is, when I read Mary's article I had the distinct feeling she might be slightly embellishing the facts, and that there might just be a hint of bias in her piece, indeed, I frequently burst out laughing and decided to re-post the whole piece here with some thoughts of my own.....
‘They’re men of fighting age!’ scream the headlines, conjuring up images of threatening brutes. Aggressive rhetoric and hyperbole have coloured the migration debate in the UK throughout 2016, targeting young, male refugees in particular. British MP David Davies claims refugees are not ‘averse to lying about their ages’, and should undergo dental checks, sparking a vicious campaign against ‘hulking’ teenagers being reunited with their families. Young men living in the Calais Jungle have been painted as ticking time bombs by the tabloid press, creating an aura of fear and ignoring the majority who crave peace and a fresh start. I spent two weeks in Calais volunteering at the Ashram Kitchen, serving food alongside the Jungle’s men of fighting age:
‘Keep it’, says Marwan, ‘keep it!’ I stand shivering as my taxi approaches. ‘Honestly Marwan, I don’t need it, really, please take it back.’
‘Keep it!’ he insists. There is no persuading him. We hug goodbye, me wrapped up in his winter jacket, him in a jumper in the cold. I stop feeling guilty. It seems appropriate that Marwan, who refuses to stand in food lines, prefers to keep me warm than keep his jacket.
Saturday, 3 December 2016
In the aftermath of Donald Trump's victory in the U.S High Priestess of SJW's, Anita Sarkeesian, lamented that left wing ''Social Justice'' had ''taken a beating''. And she was correct, they had and they have nothing to look forward to but yet more beatings in the future, their punishment must be more severe
In the heady days leading up to the election, and after the similarly seismic Brexit vote, it seemed like pretty much everyone was lining up to kerb-stomp the Social Justice Warriors, but nobody did it with more relish than a slew of high profile YouTube channels run by popular libertarianesque polemicists, some, such as Stefan Molynuex and Paul Joseph Watson, appeared to drop fully into the Alt-Right camp, with PJW running for cover when he realized that all those Anne Frank gags and White Genocide memes weren't being played for laughs, that the Alt-Right really was a ''racist'' movement.
I've recently been paying far more attention than usual to the more left-leaning members of theYouTube libertarian celeb circuit, such as Sargon of Akkad, Kraut and Tea and a little Dutch cutey called ''Gryffix''.
Many of us out here in the badlands of White Nationalism became quietly pleased with where all of this was going, these YouTube channels have considerable reach, probably on a par with a Guardian full page spread, they were mercilessly attacking the mad SJW's and anti-white dogmas, feminists, highlighting the Muslim menace and their rape waves, the liberal lugenpresse and generally undermining the anti-white, especially anti-white male narrative at the heart of the modern left. There was the odd backhander about ''racists'' and ''Neo Nazis'' but ok, we can't scare off the normies.
Monday, 28 November 2016
I happened to have my birthday recently and so I thought I'd carry on the tradition of treating myself to re-posting my favourite articles of all time. Last year we visited the seminal ''Rights of Man'' essay by Maurice Bardeche, which can be found at Counter Currents.
And I'm raiding Counter Currents again this year for this brilliant insight into the Jewish psyche.
Batman Returns: An Anti-Semitic Allegory?
Soon after the release of director Tim Burton’s Batman Returns (1992) starring Michael Keaton as Batman, Danny DeVito as the Penguin, Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman, and Christopher Walken as evil capitalist Max Shreck, America’s premier newspaper, the Jewish-controlled New York Times, published an op-ed piece by two Columbia College seniors, Rebecca Roiphe and Daniel Cooper, entitled “Batman and the Jewish Question” (July 2, 1992).
Today, Roiphe, the daughter of feminist Anne Roiphe, is a professor at New York Law School.
Batman Returns is the second movie in the series, after Tim Burton’s inaugural Batman (1989). It told the tale of the Penguin, a freakish villain who posed a deadly threat to the citizens of Gotham City. As a deformed baby, he had been secretly set adrift à la Moses in Gotham City’s river by his parents, who deemed him repellant.
Nurtured in the sewers, the Penguin tries to seize political control of the metropolis with the help of wealthy, megalomaniacal industrialist Max Shreck. Ultimately, the Penguin mounts an attack to kidnap and murder all of the first-born aristocratic children of Gotham City.
This last plot element, an obvious reference to Passover, was introduced by Jewish screenwriter Wesley Strick, who admitted, “of course I was referring to Exodus.”
In their article, the two Ivy League Jews charged that Batman Returns was anti-Semitic. The Penguin, they averred, “is not just a deformed man, half human, half-Arctic-beast. He is a Jew, down to his hooked nose, pale face and lust for herring.”
Friday, 25 November 2016
On the same day national newspapers launched a manhunt against Millennial Woes The Guardian carried a piece by somebody called ''Pandora Blake'' in which Blake lamented the draconian online censorship laws in Britain:
I’m no stranger to censorship. Last year, Dreams of Spanking was unsuccessfully targeted under the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014, because my consensual BDSM videos depict spankings that leave marks. After a traumatic, invasive investigation, I was forced to take my site offline – and I was left in no doubt that the law considers kinky sexualities such as mine to be obscene.
Acts that are legal to perform in the UK, but not legal to depict in porn, which includes fisting, watersports and female ejaculation (if the fluid lands on another person, or is consumed).
What message are we sending to young women by criminalising porn that depicts a visual, undeniable representation of female sexual fulfilment? Do we really want girls to think that the way their bodies naturally respond to pleasure is obscene?
Attacking online porn is a cheap way to score political points – and it’s a distraction from the real issues.The Guardian didn't just carry the story, they allowed this insane pervert to write her own article on why it's wrong for her to be unable to make money from peddling ''fisting' videos to young girls under the guise of ''education''. To the left this is what constitutes a 'free speech' issue worth fighting for, if the opportunity arises to ram Western civilization further into the sewer than it already is, then the most prominent left leaning broadsheet in the land will embrace it with gusto.
Tuesday, 22 November 2016
Richard Spencer's recent speech at the NPI conference, complete with ''Hail Victory, Hail Trump!'' and a wave of fascist salutes, sent the 'lugenpresse' into full ''They're here! it's happening!'' meltdown.
I even noticed some people within our own circles expressing some dismay and so I thought I'd post the whole speech for everyone to listen to and see for themselves what all of the fuss is about. The speech itself is excellent and deserves to be viewed in full. Spencer is on fire when he answers the left's hysterics of wishing to not ''normalize'' Donald Trump or the Alt-Right. Spencer asks of the left ''What is normal?''. He's using the left's relativism against them.
Is it 'normal' that our governments silence us as they flood our countries with killers and religious nuts?
Is it 'normal' that the American military has whole armies stationed in Europe to ''keep the peace'' while thousands of European women are raped by Muslims?
Is it 'normal' that the only moral position which can be held by the Western media and political establishments is one in which Europeans are demographically erased while being demonized as they dwindle away?
Spencer and some of the other big hitters of the Alt-Right were purged from Twitter one week before this conference, and when you watch this you can see why, it's a damning indictment of our 'elites' and a call to arms, to victory, and a vision of a better tomorrow for our people. However, given that Twitter has silenced Spencer I feel obliged to do my bit by highlighting his speech here.
Friday, 18 November 2016
Here in Britain it's become something of a tradition for higher-end department stores and supermarkets to sink a sizable proportion of their advertizing budget into producing rather glossy, well produced Christmas tailored ads. They aren't designed to simply flog cheap booze and turkey, they're a cultural event, the aim is to associate the brand with Christmas by delicately plucking the yuletide strings of the British consumer.
The 'Big Three', John Lewis, Sainsbury's and Marks and Spencer have recently released their Christmas ads into the British cultural space, each trying to outdo the others in encapsulating that magic glow of Christmas feeling. The actual content of their ads, however, reveals that these companies are not just competing for the market share in goose fat and sherry, they're also in competition with each other to see who can produce the most blatant Cultural Marxist propaganda of the season. It isn't enough to shift the most pork pies, these days a company also has to sit atop the Christmas tree as the most gender neutral, non-white patriarchal, politically correct little angel on the telly.
Tuesday, 15 November 2016
I'm forever fascinated by the clever tricks and techniques adopted by Hollywood and the media to manipulate us and direct our thinking. World War 2 and everything related to Nazis and Jews is Ground Zero, it's the foundation upon which a new moral framework has been built. The sacred 6,000,000 were sacrificed on the alter of European racism and hate in order that Europe could be reborn, a Europe which would become a shining beacon of humanitarian ideals and anti-racism.
The You Tuber Rob Ager whose analysis and deconstruction of movies I've admired for years, has come up with an absolute masterclass in his latest on Saving Private Ryan, directed of course by Steven Spielberg. It's worth noting that Rob is something of a ''normie'' and seems to recognize he's on some shaky ground here as far as his subscribers go, he explains at length that his analysis of Saving Private Ryan is not an apology for Nazism, he's simply explaining the insidious and rather grotesque manner in which Hollywood has demonized Germans in the film, and make no mistake, it is Germans rather than 'Nazis'.
To summarize briefly, here are some of the tricks used by Spielberg and Hollywood to mold your thinking on World War 2 and the Germans in Saving Private Ryan:
Saturday, 12 November 2016
If Brexit was an uppercut to the system then Trump's victory was a roundhouse to its jaw and all the liberal classes can look forward to now is having The Donald kick their teeth out and humiliate them from the highest office on earth, they know it, we know it, Donald Trump knows it. Most satisfying of all is that they know we weren't tricked, it isn't that we're just misguided and too thick to understand, no, we do understand and we want to see them hurt, to see them in pain. For example:
''Our tailored social media feeds not only hid from us the confused, angry people we needed to try and reason with, but it gave us a warped view of their motives. And this is where it gets particularly scary: Trump voters are fully aware he is sexist and xenophobic, they just don't care''.
So wrote Christopher Hooton in the Left Wing 'broadsheet press' outlet , The Independent. Hooton belongs to the most tragic demographic on earth, the 'White Liberal Male' and his tragedy is compounded by the fact that Hooton is gullible enough to think the modern left, and the liberal project in general, are all about 'fair play' and, well, being an open minded liberal who takes on-board all opinions and world views.
For Hooton the problem is a failure of the liberal classes to listen, it's the mad, naive notion that the system to which he belongs and makes his living, isn't obsessively and blatantly hostile toward white people. Like a good white man from another age his article is trying to find a middle ground which no longer exists, he's saying ''Whoa! this thing got crazy, everybody take a step back and a deep breath!''.
If they (populists) only care about lying directly to the voter, be it through Facebook Lives or alt-right puppet blogs that look as legit through the window of social media as the broadsheet press?
On this front, vast swathes of the media were effectively neutralised; but much of the snark and hyperbole directed at Trump supporters could have been avoided.Again, we see that good-guy Hooton is on the fence, however, as somebody who actually runs an ''Alt-Right puppet blog'' I can say that 'we' neutralised the MSM by making the MSM itself the subject of scrutiny and ridicule. We make ourselves 'legit' by exposing the lies and moral cancer of the 'lugenpresse' which is now seen as ethically illegitimate. And I'm going to do it again now....
Tuesday, 8 November 2016
The US election is finally upon us. A billion God Emperor memes, and even more anti-Trump hit-piece articles in the MSM, the Republican party shredded, Hillary's seemingly endless list of crimes and dodgy dealings, The Wall, the ban on Muslims...it's all led to this, we're here.
As with the Brexit referendum it's worth having a 'live' post up which can be updated as news comes in, along with adding any vids or Tweets of interest as the drama unfolds.
Friday, 4 November 2016
The meteoric rise of Donald Trump is one of the most astonishing political events in living memory. He burst onto the scene last June when he announced that he was running for president with his now famous anti illegal immigration speech in which he dared to make reference to the disproportionate number of crimes committed by illegal alien mestizos, or "dreamers" as the left absurdly calls them . The mainstream media and political establishment clutched their pearls and gasped that a man running for president might publicly utter such a hate fact. From that moment on he has been derided and pilloried by the entire Democratic, Republican, financial and media establishments. Yet, despite all of forces and vast resources arrayed against him, he just continues to grow stronger and stronger.
Donald Trump has a simple message that strongly resonates with the majority of the American public who are among the most patriotic, and by implication nationalist, in the world. It is time to stop submitting to the will of the rootless globalist elites and put America First. He promises to crack down on illegal immigration, to end Washington corruption, to keep muslims out, to represent the people rather than special interests, and to renegotiate or end international trade agreements and stop the flow of well paid industrial jobs out of America. This is a hugely popular message that the American people have been waiting decades to hear, and has them flooding into Trump rallies in their tens of thousands. Trump, for his part, is working like a machine making constant media appearances and speaking at three rallies per day.
Clinton, by contrast, is pursuing one of the mot pitiful campaign strategies in history. She has no vision for the future, other than that she would like to see a borderless hemisphere from Alaska to Brazil, .a 550% increase in Syrian immigration and an amnesty for illegal immigrants. These policies are so unpopular that she scarcely dare mention them in public, so the vast majority of her campaign consists of endlessly repeating, "Donald Trump is a big meanie. He makes girls cry. Sexism, racism, misogyny wah wah!". In addition, Hillary's massive unpopularity and health problems have prompted her campaign team to keep her out of the public eye as much as possible.
Hillary has more or less sat this election out and left it to her surrogates in the liberal media, i.e. all of it, to campaign on her behalf, and campaign they have. The extent of the bias and dishonesty displayed by the American media is like nothing I have ever witnessed. The BBC will at least tell you the basic facts with a left-liberal spin, so you filter out the leftist spin they will at least give you a reasonable idea of what is going on in the world. In this election the American news media has sunk to new lows by either mis-reporting or completely failing to report the facts. They are clearly rattled, as they never did anything like this in the last election.
In the first debate Trump destroyed Hillary on trade and the economy. At the very end of the debate Hillary deployed her trademark "Trump is a big meanie" card by bringing up a former Miss Universe who, twenty years later, remains distraught about the fact that Trump had the temerity to call her fat when she got fat. Women's fragile self esteem must be protected from reality at all costs. Needless to say the news media made no mention of Trump's devastating economic arguments instead focusing all of their attention on the more pressing issue of the two decade old hurt feelings of a portly beauty queen.
Similarly, when Trump unveiled his contract with America in Gettysburg including such groundbreaking measures as a ban on former politicians becoming lobbyists, a ban on foreign entities paying lobbyists and a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on congressmen and senators. This was huge news of great importance and interest to the public, but the media failed to report on it at all. Instead, the only point they reported from this speech was a footnote in which Trump confirmed he would sue the women who falsely accused him of sexual misconduct. Absolutely incredible.
The media's misleading reporting about the sises of the crowds at the parties' rallies, inflating Hillary's and diminishing Trump's, has become a running joke. Even more disgraceful has been the massaged and perhaps even downright fraudulent polls which claimed that Hillary was up to 12 points ahead when all of the evidence on the ground pointed to an entirely different state of affairs, as detailed in the two discussions between Stefan Molyneux and Bill Mitchell here and here. However, as the election approaches the media tell us that the polls have miraculously changed and that the parties are now neck and neck in the hope that they will not be left looking utterly ridiculous come election day.
The entire mainstream media might be in the bag for Hillary, but Trump is winning the internet by a massive margin. Thanks to YouTube he can get his speeches directly to the public in their entirety without having to go through a media gatekeeper. His Alt Right troll army mercilessly ridicules the liberals and cucks and the penetrating analysis offered by the likes of Stefan Molyneux, Styxhexenhammer and Fash The Nation puts the middlebrow musings of the mainstream media to shame. I think we are witnessing the precise moment in history when the internet became more powerful than the mainstream media, when a guy with a webcam could be as persuasive as a multi billion dollar news network. No wonder the establishment are terrified.
Whether Trump wins or loses, 2016 will be remembered as the year that establishment republicanism died. By withdrawing their support for Trump, thus tacitly endorsing Clinton, they have removed all doubt that they have more in common with the Democratic establishment than they do with their own base. If Trump wins after repeated electoral failures by the cuckservatives he will prove that they are redundant. If Trump loses, and if he does lose it will be narrowly, the Republican base will never forgive the party leadership for deliberately sabotaging his bid and subjecting them to four or eight years of Hillary Clinton.
In spite of all of the naysayers who dismiss Trump as a Zionist puppet or not a full blooded nationalist, a Trump victory would be the greatest strike against globalism since the end of World War Two. However, a Trump victory is not in itself, enough to halt America's decline. He has already shifted his focus from deporting all illegal aliens to deporting criminal illegal aliens. Even if the wall is built and non white immigration is all but stopped it will not be enough to halt America' demographic death spiral. Already, the majority of babies born in the US are non white. Trump has no plans to reverse this. As the TV pundits gleefully point out, if the hispanics don't decide this election, they will decide the next one.
Tuesday, 1 November 2016
One week out from the US election and camp Hillary is in disarray, the latest revelations of missing emails and yet more corruption and a new investigation by the FBI is starting to take its toll in the polls. But this is no time for complacency, Trump is not assured a win, the fact is we need everybody we can muster, whether living in the US or not, to engage the liberals, especially American liberals, on social media and to capitalize on the latest Clinton scandal.
Friday, 28 October 2016
This Week the Daily Mirror carried an article with this headline:
Under the banner accompanying the headline was this photo:
Whenever healthy white men look upon such a bunch of men set to invade the civilization we've built, something is 'triggered' and it's not just the racial cuckoldry which is taking shape, it's also the sense, and let us be honest about it, that these refugees are simply loathsome trash, it isn't just their race, it's simply the way they are too.
Saturday, 22 October 2016
I first came across the term ''White Privilege'' about five years ago in an article in the Telegraph which was a response to Laurie Penny's (surprise surprise) attempt to bring the idea into popular discourse in Britain. It was one of those occasions when you knew instantly an idea or policy is bad news, understanding the term itself and the theory of White Privilege was to be made aware that the enemy had been working on a new weapon which was in the process of being tweaked and polished before being rolled out onto the meta-political battlefield.
...And now it has.
White Privilege Theory emanates from the ''Social Science'' wing of modern leftist thought, this is the field of study which has given us the tragic and insane ''Social Justice Warrior''. The standard response to White Privilege theory of the Ethno-Nationalist is to reject the entire premise out of hand, non-whites cannot be oppressed by whites if they are no longer living in our countries. Furthermore, the existence of White Privilege Theory as a valid subject within academia undermines the premise of the theory because if the society was directed toward ''privileging'' whites above everyone else then why haven't whites shutdown such studies?.
Wednesday, 19 October 2016
Some idle speculation on a recent murder in my home town.....
On Monday a murder took place here in the North East of England which has left many of the locals, myself included, somewhat baffled. Newcastle and the North East are 'rough' and relatively poor but murder is exceptionally rare, and the manner of Jodie Wilkinson's murder must qualify as unique, according to the BBC:
''Jodie Wilkinson, 27, died in hospital after being attacked by a group of up to 11 men in the city's Stanhope Street on Monday afternoon, police said.
A 25-year-old man who was with her at the time was also injured and needed hospital treatment.
Police said those arrested, a man aged 43, two aged 25, and three others aged 22, 20 and 18, were being questioned.''
Saturday, 15 October 2016
Fiend, I defy thee! with a calm, fixed mind,
All that thou canst inflict I bid thee do;
Foul Tyrant both of Gods and Human-kind,
One only being shalt thou not subdue....Thou art omnipotent.
O'er all things but thyself I gave thee power,
And my own will....
I curse thee! let a sufferer's curse
Clasp thee, his torturer, like remorse;
'Till thine Infinity shall be
A robe of envenomed agony;
And thine Omnipotence a crown of pain,
To cling like burning gold round thy dissolving brain
Here in post-Brexit Britain the liberal intelligentsia have developed a canny little trick to misinform the British public, indeed, this is becoming the standard line of the lefty hive-mind everywhere, whether Owen Jones in The Guardian or a chubby YouTube cuck. The line being peddled is that the millions of working class Whites who voted to leave the EU were mistakenly 'lashing out' at immigrants, it is the ''Don't blame the migrants and refugees'' argument. What flows from that is a tedious debate on the economics of mass immigration, if working class Whites have suffered financially, they argue, then it should be the Tories and big business who are to blame, not the migrants themselves. The solution is more ''equality'' and jobs, raising the minimum wage and so on.
Wednesday, 12 October 2016
I recently came across a fascinating video which goes into some detail on the increasing levels of internet censorship, who is doing it and why, what their long term aims are and who ((They)) deem to be the gravest threat to their scheming. It's depressing but I don't know how much longer blogs such as this one will be able to survive. As is explained in the video, they are using the comments section of the New York Times as a test ground, words or phrases which they deem ''Hate'' will be written into Google's programming and then the machine will be set loose to simply Shut Down or de-list anything which transgresses the new speech codes.
Most of the time when we think of censorship we think of the cops kicking your door down and dragging you off to Right Think camp, but the future is shaping up to be even worse, you'll be unable to publish a Thought Crime on the internet in the first place and because it's private companies doing this and not governments, there's nothing you can do about it, you don't get to vote Google out. And make no mistake, it is the 'Far Right' that is the problem for these people, as is explained in this excellent production......
Saturday, 8 October 2016
Written by RW Jetz
According to the Jewish media, the sexual revolution which burgeoned in the 1960s was a time of much-needed freedom from prudish oppression. The dawn of free love, ‘flower power’, and hippy culture was a symbol of times changing towards equality and mass acceptance of diversity. The revolution was cleverly marketed. With the concurrent (Jewish) inventions of the pill and condom, gays and straights, men and women alike, were now ready to be liberated from societal judgement on their sexual habits. A human being could now choose to have casual sex with someone, without fear of being judged and ostracised. To most people, this must have sounded wonderful. However, the reality of such liberalisation of traditions has proved quite the contrary – at least, for those who care for the future of the White race.
A few statistics make this sobering fact clear. The average age of the (primarily White) population is quickly rising while (White) birth rates slump to an all-time low. Meanwhile marriage rates are down to their lowest levels since 1862, and the divorce rate creeps steadily upwards. The environments in which children could be raised and thrive are therefore far fewer than in past generations, because those environments have historically been the preserve of married, monogamous couples. The problem is – clearly – that people aren't getting married much anymore. And when they are, it doesn’t last long. What has happened to marriage since its heyday, and what part did the sexual revolution play in its decline?
To formulate an answer to such a broad question, it is necessary to first review how the revolution came to pass: what could a revolution stand to offer either sex, and how did its leaders bring it about? The sexes are innately dimorphous, and so sexual liberation, as promised by the revolution’ proponents, would necessarily stand to mean a different thing for men and women. F. Roger Devlin aptly outlines the two divergent ideals of sexual freedom as envisaged by both the male and female imperatives in his polemical essay 'Sexual Utopia In Power' (which I heartily recommend). First, the male vision:
Monday, 3 October 2016
Last week a BBC radio presenter and comedian received a phone call in which he was told flat-out that he was being fired because he was a white male:
'I'll get straight to the point,' she continued. 'I'm afraid for the next series, we're not inviting you back. We're recasting it with more women and diversity.''
Jon Holmes had been working for the BBC for 18 years, his career was sprinkled with Baftas and plaudits from his liberal peers in the British intelligentsia, but there's a larger agenda in play here and Jon's career had to be liquidated to make way for his politically correct replacements.
It's hard to have much in the way of sympathy, the pundits and 'edgy' comedians of the BBC have been cherry picked for decades, the joke was always on working class whites, conservative whites, Christian whites, whites who live in the Shires, whites who vote UKIP, whites angry at mass immigration, whites scared of Islam, whites who want out of the EU.
The role of the BBC career personality is to drag the little Englanders up before the High Court of the Notting Hill and Chelsea priesthood to be ridiculed for their ignorance and racism, to pillory them for their longing to be left alone to live like Hobbits far away from the ''enrichment'' and without having to deal with falsely generated guilt and shame.
Friday, 30 September 2016
I do enjoy a bit of drama and Milo-Gate hasn't let me down, I've spent more time than usual catching up with the latest discussions and podcasts, reading comments threads and various articles. Back in April when Milo Yiannopoulos began flirting with the Alt-Right I wrote an article in which I expressed my dismay that a flamboyant gay Jew should be courting a movement which would see him deported to Israel, but if he was willing to help us achieve that goal then, hey, great!.
So here we are half a year later, it seems like as good a time as any to assess how useful Milo has been to the cause of racial Nationalism.
Sunday, 25 September 2016
In David Lean's great wartime movie 'Bridge over the river Kwai' the British prisoners of war are set to work building a bridge for the Japanese, Colonel Nichols (Alec Guinness) becomes obsessed with using the construction of the bridge as a means by which his men's discipline can be held together and, more importantly, to prove to the Japanese that the British army are capable of building a better bridge than they. Nichols' monomania makes his men's lives more miserable than the Japanese ever did, but eventually the bridge is finished and Nichols stands proudly gazing upon it, adoring it, it's surely the best bridge in all of Asia, and the British army built it.
Nichols finally understands his monumental folly when he notices allied soldiers desperately trying to destroy his bridge and worse, the chunting of a Japanese train carrying thousands of troops and tonnes of armaments and supplies. Nichols became so blinded by his own ego and chauvinism that he forgot his bridge was a huge benefit to his enemy's war effort, before dying, taking his bridge with him, the heartbroken Nichols gasps ''What have I done?''.
Similarly, Polly Toynbee wrote an article in The Guardian recently which she called:
Wednesday, 21 September 2016
A while back I made post called 'Five Shades Of Liberal' in which I attempted to dissect the mentality of five random liberals on Twitter. Some comments under the post suggested the subject of debating leftists and liberals should become more of a blog focus, I remembered that the other other day when I happened to run into a Marxist teacher on a ''RefugeesWelcome'' trend after they protested in London demanding we take in more! Muslims.
One of the points I hammer relentlessly on this blog is that the left are not revolutionaries but rather an inherent part of the system, they are not outside it, they are of it and everything they do and everything they endorse further empowers the real power, which is High Finance.
So, the test subject here, despite his youthful appearance, is not a student but a teacher, as you can see from his profile he hits all of the right beats and ticks all of the right boxes, he's your typical middle class left wing Twat.
Saturday, 17 September 2016
Most readers of this blog will be familiar with the left's quite brilliant use of semantics and sophistry, often completely ignoring the facts and data in favour of clever wordplay. Examples include erroneously appropriating virtuous sounding words like "liberal" and "progressive" for themselves and branding their opponents as suffering from various "isms" and "phobias" that are suggestive of mental illness. One of the most pernicious examples of the left's cunning use of language is their use of the word “pseudo" as a prefix to any academic work or idea that contradicts their world view. In particular, "pseudo-science" and "pseudo-intellectual". The Oxford English dictionary defines Pseudo as:
1. Not genuine, a sham.
2. Informal, pretentious or insincere.
Therefore, by the mere application of the prefix "pseudo", the left believe that they can instantly discredit anything they disagree without engaging in any discussion of the substantive issues. As always, they adopt this dishonest approach because the facts are not on their side. It is enough to cause one to suspect that their movement might be led by people with unusually high levels of verbal intelligence. However, facts will beat sophistry every time.
The left frequently use the term "pseudo-science" to dismiss out of hand any scientific evidence relating to racial differences between human populations. They will haughtily dismiss all of the data as irrelevant ab initio without even taking the time or trouble to address it merits. However, it is the left's shibboleth of universal human equality that is without scientific foundation. The notion of human racial equality does not come from hard science. It is a sociological and anthropological theory that gained traction for political reasons shortly after World War II. In 1948 the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) issued a proposal calling for theUNESCO issued no less than four statements on race between 1950 and 1967, drafted by such luminaries as (((Morris Ginsbeg))), (((Claude Levi Strauss))). The 1950 statement was drafted by sociologists and anthropologists and included some truly startling, and entirely unsubstantiated, claims such as:
"general adoption of a programme of dissemination of scientific facts designed to bring about the disappearance of that which is commonly called race prejudice"
They knew the answer they wanted before they even asked the question. This was not science. It was an exercise in propaganda.
"general adoption of a programme of dissemination of scientific facts designed to bring about the disappearance of that which is commonly called race prejudice"
They knew the answer they wanted before they even asked the question. This was not science. It was an exercise in propaganda.
"Given similar degrees of cultural opportunity to realise their potentialities, the average achievement of the members of each ethnic group is about the same".
Of course, the reason why establishment left is unable to discuss race in a fact based and scholarly manner is because there is no hard data which supports their dogma of universal racial equality. All they have to offer is well meaning platitudes and a variety of canards, red herrings and straw men which are embarrassingly easy to rebut.
1. "Most scientists agree that there is no such thing as race". Yes. They avoid the word race and use less incendiary terminology like population groups instead, but it means the same thing.
2. "There is greater variation among the members of each race than between the races". This is true, but it is utterly meaningless. The fact that a white Olympic sprinter can run faster than an obese black asthmatic or that a black university professor is more intelligent than a white retard does nothing to change the different averages of each group. These outliers are already included within those averages.
3. "All human beings share more than 99% of their genes". This is true but, again, it is totally meaningless. We also share 98% of our genes with chimpanzees and 60% of our genes with chickens. Tiny differences in genetic code can create huge differences in outcome.
4. "Black people have higher rates of criminality and lower educational attainment due to their culture/environment". This has been disproved by countless twin adoption studies, but it is irrelevant in any event because whether their deficiencies a due to genetics or culture, or a combination of the two, the fact is that they exist.
5. "No race is superior to any other". A classic straw man. Few people claim that one race is superior to another overall. Each race is adapted to the environment in which it evolved. Each race is better at some things and worse at others. Difference does not imply overall superiority.
6. "Race is only skin colour". See the numbered points below.
Racial egalitarianism and blank slate theory are virtually fact free. They are an exercise in obfuscation and whataboutery. They themselves are examples of pseudoscience on a par with astrology and creationism. All the racial egalitarians have is, "Everyone is the same because we say they are. Dissent against this point of view will not be tolerated". By contrast, the hard data supporting biological racial differences is voluminous and overwhelming. Examples include:-
1. Forensic scientists can discover a person’s race from their skeletal remains with over 80% accuracy and from their DNA with over 99% accuracy.
2. Every IQ test and public examination ever conducted in any country show the same stratification of the races.
3. Black women have narrower hips as black babies are born with smaller heads/brains.
4. Every finalist the Olympic men's 100 meters since 1980 has been of West African ancestry.
5. Certain parasites can live on some races but not on others.
6. Transplanted organs from member of another race are far more likely to be rejected by the recipient.
7. Certain diseases only affect, or are more prevalent in, certain races.
8. The races have diffrent brain sizes.
I could go on all day, but I'm sure you get the point. This will be familiar stuff to most of the Morgoth's Review regulars, but this article from Radix Journal sets out a useful summary for newcomers to the topic.
This would not be such an important issue if it was just a matter of crusty old professors talking among themselves, but the entirety of western government policy is based upon this baloney. Countless billions have been wasted, and continue to be wasted, on the impossible task of trying to make black and brown life outcomes the same as white life outcomes. We could be on Mars by now if the money we had wasted on this nonsense had been more productively spent.
A close cousin to pseudo-science is "pseudo-intellectual" which the left and the academic establishment, which are in practical terms the same thing, use to describe any thinker who they disagree with but are unable to rebut. It is frequently used in relation to highly intelligent race dissidents such as Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer. No need to deal with their substantive positions, just call them "pseudo" and hope they go away.
Wednesday, 14 September 2016
My old friend and mentor from the Daily Telegraph comments section, Guessed Worker, has an absolutely blistering article up at Majority Rights so I thought I'd re-post it here too.
Trump in the USA, Hofer in Austria, the rise of the AfD in Germany and that of the Swedish Democrats, Le Pen and Wilders both leading in the polls, the Brexit triumph in Britain, and talk of Nexit and Frexit on the horizon … all across the West these are days of hope, even expectation if one is a patriot, and of definite glimmers of opportunity if one is a nationalist.
The worldly power of the liberal elites, of the political internationalists, and of the corporate players might not be waning just yet. They are, for the greater part, still in government or forming government agenda across the West. They still populate the global fora. They still have the media class to sell their economic and social values, and shape the public perception of any opposition. But despite all this they don’t have quite the control they once did over public discourse and, increasingly, over the electoral process. From the ever-widening political margins they are under sustained and successful ideological attack. Where this attack comes from the anti-austerity left, with its Achilles heel of anti-racism and open borders, it has proved possible for the Establishment to absorb it. But where it comes from the populist right, with its anti-Islam and anti-immigration elements, that’s just not possible. People start thinking the unthinkable, namely that these elites, who act like gods and dispose of the European life as they please, are nothing better than base criminals and deserve only our total contempt and, in the worst cases, perhaps a prison cell.
Friday, 9 September 2016
On the day Black Lives Matter UK invaded Heathrow airport and disrupted the holiday schedule of thousands of white families, the London Evening Standard carried a video taken from CCTV footage of a white woman being dragged off her feet by her neck and violently mugged by two blacks, having a ring yanked from her finger. As the Lefties and black activists crowed on Twitter about the havoc they had caused at Heathrow, that white woman was sitting with a police medic, in shock and traumatized, calling her family to explain she'd been mugged.
The standard argument of the 'Right' to blacks agitating against 'police brutality' is to point out that blacks commit more crime and therefore come into contact more frequently with the police, therefore they're more likely to die in police custody or while resisting arrest. And this is perfectly true, it's also true that a white man carrying a car full of heroine and facing 15 years in jail will offer less resistance to the police than a black who's just robbed a diet coke from a store.
Sunday, 4 September 2016
The second entry into my series of posts explaining why I hold the views I do, part one can be read here.
In the early 2000's while in my early 20's I left the north of England and went into Europe backpacking, I ended up remaining in Europe for over a decade, primarily living and working in the Benelux countries. Like many young people who set off for Europe I had a set of preconceived ideas as to how various European countries would be, not just ethnically, but culturally, the general 'feel' of being in France would be different to Holland or Germany and, of course, Britain.
These naive assumptions were swiftly dispelled upon actually entering France, the first country I traveled to. I had never before seen so many non-White people in one place, it simply wasn't very 'French'. The fast-food chains and fashions of Britain were all here too, all that really had changed since passing through London was the language. I became still more disillusioned when traveling further, from Paris it's a mere few hours aboard a train then you're in another country, another capital city. But it didn't really matter, whether it was Brussels or Amsterdam, it would always be remarkably similar. It would always be 30-40% non-White and the Global brands would always dominate the streets along with blacks and Muslims.
Thursday, 1 September 2016
The last time I paid any attention to Ben Shapiro he was on the losing end of the Breitbart civil war, Shapiro has long fancied himself as the nemesis of Donald Trump and the Alt-Right, and that was the cause of the Breitbart crisis. Needless to say, it hasn't been a very good year for Ben and I'd assumed he was destined to feature only as a ''Conservative expert'' on Fox News or whatever slot his fellow Jews could wrangle for him, but no, I was wrong...
The recent surge of interest in the Alt-Right meant that I spent more time than usual searching that term on You Tube to keep track of what the latest news was, however, because Ben Shapiro spends an extraordinary amount of time attacking the Alt-Right, You Tube was suggesting his material as videos I'd be interested in.
I swiftly noticed that there was a marked difference in tone and style, Ben was forever 'destroying' somebody or 'massacring' or 'slaughtering' them. Shapiro himself has adopted the air of an angry rebel, he's frequently unshaven and has a general attitude of being a rogue against the system. What the hell is going on? Is Ben Shapiro a 'Shitlord' now?.
Tuesday, 30 August 2016
I recently stumbled across 'Fiddler on the Roof' and decided to watch it, I was aware that there was a particularly Jewish musical by that name but I'd always avoided it because I dislike musicals. Today, however, an entirely Jewish musical set in Russia shortly before the Russian Revolution has much to offer to the dissident Nationalist mind.
The history of the Jews in Russia, the 'Pale of the Settlement', the animosity toward the Russian aristocracy and the rise of revolutionary Marxism, is a vast area of exploration and a post such as this could easily spiral out of control, so for the sake of brevity I'll try and keep this within the context of the Fiddler on the Roof movie, readers might want to check out ''Solzhenitsyn's Forbidden Book'' which deals with the Jewish involvement with Bolshevism and the Occidental Observers series on the 'Pale of the Settlement'.
Friday, 26 August 2016
I spent the run up to Hillary Clinton's Alt-Right speech pondering why she would make such a speech, what was in it for her and her presidential bid. I came to the conclusion that the Cultural Marxist alliance was not yet ready to overwhelm White America completely and so Hillary was attempting to reach out to non-decided voters by using the guilt by association trick on Trump, Hillary was effectively saying ''Ok, I get it, you hate me, I'm corrupt, bought and paid for, I hate you too, but look, vote for Trump and the Nazis get in too''.
And that certainly formed the bulk of her speech. However, as Radix correctly identified, what surprised was the manner in which Hillary was 'reaching out' to the cuckservative Right of American politics and attempting to absorb them into the main mass of the PC freak-show of the Democrat party. The post-Trump Republican party has its own refugee crisis, and Hillary is doing a Merkel by offering them a place at her sagging bosom, alongside the inter-sectional Trannies, Black Lives Matter and ISIS. They are now a victim group, they sold out on the issue of mass immigration, they said nothing as cities such as Detroit turned into Somalia, they clapped as the racial demographics were warped to reduce their kids to minorities, on every single issue they took the money and stabbed their own base in the back, as they cowed and buckled under Leftist Shut-Down speak.
Sunday, 21 August 2016
I recently read an article at the Occidental Observer which focused on a Globalist website called ''Project Syndicate'' and decided to check it out and see for myself what these scumbags are up to. To get an idea of how highly regarded Project Syndicate is within Globalist circles, master of evil, George Soros, follows just 4 accounts on Twitter, one of them is Project Syndicate, which he also helps fund.