Thursday, 5 October 2017

Amber's Gulag







Fifteen years in jail for reading ''Far Right propaganda'', that's the take away from Home Secretary Amber Rudd's Conservative conference speech. Click on a link once and they'll assume you slipped up on your way to the footie results or a kitten wearing a hat video, click twice and you might get away with it, three times and they come for you and send you to jail because it's a pattern and you're an extremist. What constitutes ''Far Right propaganda''? nobody knows, especially not Amber Rudd and her team who proudly banned street activist group ''National Action'' for terrorism despite the fact that they never terrorized anyone or were charged with terrorism in any way shape or form.

Another street activist group called ''Scottish Dawn'' weren't terrorists either but they were banned because somebody at a gathering claimed to have migrated there from needlessly banned non-terrorist group National Action. The Conservative Party faithful applauded loudly as Amber Rudd called them ''repugnant mutations of National Action''.


 At what point can one, without irony and a roll of the eyes, proclaim ''We're living under a totalitarian tyranny!''? where exactly is the junction where soft Neo Marxist political correctness metastasizes and meets hardened, raw diktat?

 The content of Amber Rudd's speech was essentially a long, exhaustive list of horrors people like her in the British establishment have forced on us via their grand liberal project:

Terrorism - Muslim/1 white on Muslim
FGM - Muslim/Third World in general
People fighting in Syria - Muslim
Knife crime - Black gangs
Online extremism/terror recruitment - Islam
Mopeds as getaway vehicles - Black gangs
Acid attacks - Islamic/Third world in general
Grooming - Islamic/Third world in general.

The establishment is caught in an uncomfortable bind, out of one side of their mouths dribbles the usual guff about diversity and enrichment while from the other the fact that the security services are working at full bore to contain the barbarism. Rudd claims that though 5 terrorist acts were perpetrated in Britain over the last year 7 more were thwarted. The mythical ''Far Right extremists'' are simply the segment of the population who point out the howling madness of the situation.

The ''Far Right'' are not responsible for the society which saw a gang of Muslim men jump out of a van and machete to death a young woman at Westminster Bridge, Liberals are.

They're responsible for it all, but rather than own the carnage they now seek to purge the internet and open up Gulags for those pointing out that the Globalist, NGO backed Emperor has no clothes.

They're desperate, absolutely craving for a ''Neo Nazi terrorist network'' and when one doesn't materialize they'll simply single out another group, National Action, and shoehorn them into the role. 

Why?

Many years ago I made the mistake of challenging an old man to a game of squash, despite being half his age and twice his speed he thrashed me for an hour straight. Later, over a beer, he explained where I'd gone wrong, the trick, he explained, was to always occupy the centre of the court, that way you had the choice of where to play the ball, your opponent was always in the position of reacting, frantically bolting around the court and becoming exhausted in the process while the player in the centre relaxed, not really having to move at all.

 The liberal establishment in Britain, (and further afield but let's stick with Britain) finds itself in the role of constantly reacting to the outrages they allowed to happen because of their own core liberal, Globalist ideals. As they stumble and limp around trying to keep all the balls in the air (see list above) they're jeered at and derided by the ''populist Right'' and people are beginning to recognize the absurdity of the ''elites'' and that what the new Nationalists have to say makes a great deal of sense, albeit leaving them feeling uncomfortable.

 The establishment's tactic now is to regain supremacy over the centre, to do this they aim to:

1. Use the brute power of the state to censor internet content they dislike while threatening to impose ridiculously harsh prison sentences on Thought Criminals. Literally terrorizing their own population! 

2. By drawing parallels between Islamic terrorism and their mythical ''Neo Nazi terror network'' they're able to morally equate Nationalism and Islamic extremism. The effect this has on the masses is to draw them back to the liberal centre looking for solutions.

 And so the people who created this carnage waltz back onto the centre-ground offering themselves up as the only sane people around and therefore solely capable of offering solutions to the problems they created.

 It goes without saying that the ''Lone Wolf'' nuts who're responsible for the Jo Cox killing and the attack on Finsbury Park mosque are like mana from heaven for the establishment. And just check out the relish with which Hope Not Hate have ''Banned Terrorist Group National Action'' plastered all over their site and Twitter page.

 They want violence from Nationalists, they need it, they crave it like a man dying of thirst in the desert, let's not give it to them. 


Truth, not bombs or car attacks is our weapon, Amber Rudd and her gargantuan security apparatus can spy on us, they can threaten us and they can shut down the whole internet but the truth is the truth, and our truth is that we are a people who wish to live in freedom among ourselves on our own soil. It is morally unimpeachable, using the state to terrorize political dissidents into submission...not so much. 










Become a Patron!

No comments:

Post a Comment