Friday, 25 September 2015

Taylor Swift and How Feminism is a PsyOp Against White People

Taylor Swift is being lambasted for her new music video, Wildest Dreams, commentators and journalists accusing her of racism.

Taylor Swift is dressed as a colonial-era woman on African soil. With just a few exceptions, the cast in the video — the actors playing her boyfriend and a movie director and his staff — all appear to be white.
We are shocked to think that in 2015, Taylor Swift, her record label and her video production group would think it was OK to film a video that presents a glamorous version of the white colonial fantasy of Africa. But it still stings.
Who would want to emulate this fantasy

Or this?

When she could have been showing the vibrant reality, this

Or this.

It goes on:
Here are some facts for Swift and her team: Colonialism was neither romantic nor beautiful. It was exploitative and brutal. The legacy of colonialism still lives quite loudly to this day. Scholars have argued that poor economic performance, weak property rights and tribal tensions across the continent can be traced to colonial strategies. So can other woes. In a place full of devastation and lawlessness, diseases spread like wildfire, conflict breaks out and dictators grab power.
Excuses, excuses. Meanwhile in Singapore and Hong Kong, which were also colonised, things look rather more like this and the same scholars presumably have rather less to say.

Zoom in really closely and you'll see Chinese victims of colonialism hacking at each other with machetes too

Taylor Swift has been the target of scorn for several years with feminists taking offence, apparently, at her positioning as a "good girl" who writes simple, heterosexual love songs that have mentioned virginity in a positive way.
It's been printed on T-shirts and postcards and throw pillows: "Well-behaved women seldom make history." Taylor Swift's Grammy threatens to refute this. I don't care about her personal choices, but her image of being good and pure plays right into how much the patriarchy fetishizes virginity, loves purity, and celebrates women who know their place as delicate flowers.[1]

Today though Swift cuts a different image having officially "quit" country music last year and now with Jew/new best friends, arch-feminists Lena Dunham and Lorde, in tow she is saying things like "Misogyny is ingrained in people from the time they are born" and "So to me, feminism is probably the most important movement that you could embrace, because it’s just basically another word for equality."

So all must surely be well for Swift now that she joined the feminist club, right? Right? Well, no. The attacks have only been getting worse and more vicious because the world of feminism has moved on from its goal of demonising White men and encouraging women to sleep around and never settle down to have children - fourth-wave feminism has arrived and it's here to broadcast the message that Whites are evil and that White women should "Shut the fuck up" because they are "oppressors". Unfortunately as time and history has shown, women are much more easily manipulated than men and this brainwashing has taken on a particularly brutal nature.

"People of colour" otherwise known as the Coalition of Aggressive Non-Whites Against White People, coming out with more and more of this stuff as they grow in number and confidence is unsurprising but what is so damaging is that third-wave feminism, already a subversive force that's bad for White women - turning them against White men via poisonous ideas like "rape culture", and putting them off having families - is quickly being superseded by fourth-wave, the goal of which seems to be entirely to teach White women that they are evil, their entire history and culture is evil and that they must now to be a "proper feminist" spend their entire lives apologising and grovelling to "people of colour" and campaigning against themselves and White men.

Women as "Defenders of the Status Quo"

It's easy to say "Ha, well feminists have been hating on men for ages, it's great to see them get a taste of their own medicine," but the whole point of feminism from the beginning seems to be separation of White women from White men. It's not just women who are hating their fellow Whites - look at MGTOW, most of the "Manosphere". These sites acknowledge biological differences and that women are more easily led but also incite hatred towards White women, despite the fact they have been so Jewed up they have no idea what they are doing. Right up until the 1990s women were the essential part of the Conservative Party's electorate - they voted Conservative in far larger numbers than men and were far more socially conservative. They were protectors of the family unit under the fickle and easily controlled system of "democracy" until the Frankfurt School and their followers decided that family life was "hate".

Third-Wave Feminism and the Demonisation of White Men

After CIA-funded and Bilderberg-backed second-wave feminism transformed women into good little worker bees for the elite, third-wave feminism was extremely useful to White genocide in a number of key ways. This wave of feminism is the one that has muddied the concept of consent to the degree that it puts any White male having sex with women in danger. While White men are obviously the main victims of this state of affairs, impressionable White women are also negatively affected as many obviously have come to genuinely believe, via vile brainwashing, that consensual sex can have been a terrible "rape". This is why university students are now having "consent classes" where they are told that engaging in sexual activities after one glass of wine can be "rape".

Why is all this happening? Is it because, as many men-oriented websites say, women are just evil and vindictive? Or is it because Whites need to be picked off as Whites, not as men? It also implanted the key idea that the only reason there are more men in certain jobs than women as down to "sexism" and "male privilege". This meme that humans are just programmable bipeds and any difference is down to "culture" will prove useful later.

A Case Study

Firstly I am going to show what "rape" typically is in the media, and that its third-wave form is often largely in feminists' minds, having been transplanted there by... oh, whichever kind souls just have our women's welfare in their minds, obviously. Then I am going to show the ramifications of what happens to a White man after he acquiesces to the request of a woman to "lick her out" - after that I will look at the British feminist response to a genuine attempted rape.

First, the "rape". The woman in question was "couchsurfing" in his house, and the man was depressed after losing his job, his girlfriend etc. But then... rape:

His attempt at seducing me in his bedroom worked. I did feel that I wanted to have sex with him. He told me we should go to my room because his room was opposite his parents. He suggested a cup of tea. I agreed.
He brought tea to my bedroom. I sat on the bed and he sat on the chair. I let him close the door. I let him undress me. I didn’t want to kiss him, but eventually I let him. I liked the feeling of being touched at the beginning. He examined every inch of my body, studying me like some kind of specimen. He touched me but I didn’t touch him back. He told me to, to show him some kind of love. Anything. I felt sorry for him. I told him I couldn’t love him and he said that he didn’t want my love anymore, or to have a relationship with me. He just wanted me. Maybe just my body. He told me to close me eyes, and he continued to touch me. I said it didn’t feel right anymore, and I tried to push him away. Not too forcefully though because I was afraid. I was completely dependant (sic) on him. I was in his family’s home. I didn’t know how to get to the nearest town. His family spoke only Spanish. He touched me. Then he turned me around onto me knees and stomach. I told him to stop, repeatedly. He didn’t.

It sounded like he was crying. I lay very still afterwards. I asked him why he didn’t stop and he said that it was too late. I said that was bullshit. He laughed. He said that was the first time he heard me swear. He tried to touch me again and I pulled away from him. I got up and had a shower. When I came back into the room he was dressed and remaking the bed meticulously. I had never seen a bed being made so perfectly, despite the stain on the sheets. I watched him as I put fresh clothes on. He had folded the clothes he removed from me and placed them in a neat pile on the table. He was a perfectionist. After he made the bed he went to have a shower. I turned the light off and got into bed. I didn’t know what had just happened. I felt physically disgusted, like I was a piece of meat.

This was an article from a feminist magazine in the UK and exemplifies what is considered an "acceptable" rape story in today's narrative. This sort of story fills up magazines, blogs and newspapers as an example of a typical rape, convincing millions of girls and women who have had sex and then changed their mind/not been sure about it that they have been raped. This builds distrust between White men and White women as obviously Pakistani communities etc pay no attention to this sort of thing.

A high profile instance was the constant media coverage of Emma "Mattress Girl" Sulkowicz' "rape", by a German man. Half Chinese, half Jewish Emma has been featured in glossy magazines, the New York Times and been celebrated for her "brave" performance art piece of carrying a mattress round campus to express her disgust at her university having failed to expel the German. The wheels came off the outrage bus as it was exposed as a likely hoax given that Sulkowicz had repeatedly contacted her "attacker" in friendly and flirty terms for months and months after the alleged attack yet because the story fit the narrative of Evil White Rapist, the media is still running with it even after the wheels have fallen off the bus, as VDare reports.

A footballer, Ched Evans, was pretty much scared and threatened off ever playing football again. What he had done was extremely degenerate, but then the prevailing culture is extremely degenerate. A White woman had been "picked up", in a kebab shop, by other footballers and proceeded to have sex with them. There were also black footballers involved (who got off, despite the fact she accused them of rape, too). Anyway, she requested that this Ched Evans character perform oral sex on her and he did, she asked him to have sex with her and he did.

Now obviously all of this is a less than ideal situation and before White culture was subverted by, again, people who have our best interest at heart :^) especially the interests of women, it would have been unthinkable but anyway, in the world where it happened, people campaigned long and hard to ensure Ched Evans never played football again. Celebrities lined up to lambaste the team he'd previously played for, teams which tried to sign him after he'd served his prison sentence were bombarded with calls and emails and protests until no one would dare touch him.

At the same time we have Ione Wells, who was nearly raped outside her home by a dindu. Ione bravely spoke out about her ordeal. I say "bravely" not because speaking out against rape is a brave thing in this day and age, as "rape" when it comes to campaigning nowadays seems to refer to white, working class men so much as wolf-whistling at a girl, but because hers was definitively the wrong sort of rapist.

Her attacker was a 17-year-old Somalian and the attack went like this:

When you were caught on CCTV following me through my own neighbourhood from the Tube, when you waited until I was on my own street to approach me, when you clapped your hand around my face until I could not breathe, when you pushed me to my knees until my face bled, when I wrestled with your hand just enough so that I could scream. When you dragged me by my hair, and when you smashed my head against the pavement and told me to stop screaming for help, when my neighbour saw you from her window and shouted at you and you looked her in the eye and carried on kicking me in the back and neck. When you tore my bra in half from the sheer force you grabbed my breast, when you didn’t reach once for my belongings because you wanted my body, when you failed to have my body because all my neighbours and family came out, and you saw them face-to-face. When CCTV caught you running from your attempted assault on me… and then following another woman twenty minutes later from the same tube station before you were arrested on suspicion. When I was in the police station until 5am while you were four floors below me in custody, when I had to hand over my clothes and photographs of the marks and cuts on my naked body to forensic teams – did you ever think of the people in your life?

This is from an open letter to her attempted rapist which "went viral", as they say. What is most tragic about the letter is its naivety and that it exposes in full the fact that here in the West people genuinely believe everyone is born equal and that everyone is the same. As is put pretty well here, Black people do not have the same feelings as White people and whatever our moral educators and betters (:^)) in the West have led White people to believe, ethnocentrism is completely normal outside of the West while Whites are the only people who came to develop much of a conscience for those not in any traditional "in-group".

The equivalent of a heartfelt letter to a Somalian rapist

She continues:

I don’t know who the people in your life are. I don’t know anything about you. But I do know this: you did not just attack me that night. I am a daughter, I am a friend, I am a girlfriend, I am a pupil, I am a cousin, I am a niece, I am a neighbour, I am the employee who served everyone down the road coffee in the cafĂ© under the railway. All the people who form those relations to me make up my community, and you assaulted every single one of them. You violated the truth that I will never cease to fight for, and which all of those people represent – that there are infinitely more good people in the world than bad.

SHEEEEEEIIIIIIT. What all dis? Me? A dindu nuffin.  A got ma rights. Yo where da white women at?

Because of the lies of Boas, Gould et al about human biodiversity, and due to naive White universalism Wells spouts tragic paragraphs like the above, thinking Black people are the same as her and that they see everyone as an equal.

Jane Kelly wrote about Wells' attack in the Spectator, pointing out that in the 1980s she had had a Black try to strangle her before attempting rape and that she had been "saved by locals" (read: White people). She said she'd made the mistake, when writing an article about her attack, of mentioning the assailant's race and said that the left, at the time, had blamed her for her assault and accused her of "racist body language". Thus she said she understood why Wells wrote a letter which avoided any allusion to her attacker's background, and also pointed out that the BBC and none of the national papers had done this either. For all anyone knew, Ione's rapist was another Ched Evans - one of the evil Whites the press never tires of highlighting and warning about. Anyway her campaign which was "hashtagged" #NotGuilty didn't really gain anywhere near the attention of any of the campaigns against Evans. No one criticised the Somali youth, talked about "cultural" problems like they do with White men nor anything else.

One problem when trying to get through to White women who have been infected by feminism, and men (though they are fewer), is that they have been weaned on "privilege theory", by the likes of Jew Noel Ignatiev, which is that it that those supposedly with more power should defer for people supposedly with less power. It is also why when a Black person says "Whites are evil", someone calling him a racist doesn't work for the brainwashed. Because racism is prejudice + power and therefore can only be done by Whites. And merely mentioning Jews means you're a Nazi, so that's a non-starter.

A brainwashed White woman went to Haiti and was, predictably, raped by a Black man and proceeded to blame his actions on "White patriarchy".

"Rape" is obsessed about in feminism not for the sake of women but entirely to demonise White men. Monstrous, violent stranger rapes, which are far more characteristic of some types of non-White men, are airbrushed out of the narrative by the media, their actors and victims inconvenient. Meanwhile "rape culture" is shouted about from the rooftops of every university, magazine, blog and newspaper as a huge threat to women, women who have had drunk sex and regretful sex encouraged to feel as much resentment as possible, feminists convincing them that they are victims of a terrible crime they must feel angry and upset about. If they cared about women at all then the spotlight would be on keeping safe from violent stranger rapists, but it's not about women it's about White people.

Fourth-Wave Feminism and the Outright Assault on White People

What we are seeing now is that feminism has moved from the Jew-controlled sphere of stopping White people from breeding with White people (although this is very much in place with the transgender lobby which pumps White children with sterilising hormones) and is now controlled by a coalition of hostile anti-Whites drunk on Jew-juice that Whites are evil and to blame for everything. That Jews have lost control is evident from that Jew feminists are being criticised as if they were the evil Whites (these goys never heard of the Holocaust??!?!!), shown in the massive criticism of the likes of Lena Dunham, for not packing her TV show Girls with negroes, but the result is certainly no better, though.

"Privilege theory", or that the only reason there are more men in certain plum jobs than women is down to discrimination, has worked its wonders so that White feminists are easily tricked into thinking that the reason they earn more than men "who could be brothers of Trayvon" is because of evil White racism. much as with White men it was supposedly down to sexism.

Rowan Blanchard, some sort of tween actress aged 13 with "Middle Eastern and Northern European ancestry", "spoke out" on Instagram about "White feminism" and talked about how White women are oppressing Black women and trans "women". A website typical of this sort of feminism, which is the prevalent sort to be found now among under 20s and the ever-growing non-White component within this age group, is Everyday Feminism.

Anti-White? No such thing. We're just correcting "privilege", see?

One particularly heinous article says that White women in relationships with non-White men are "oppressing" them. While this is great in that the fewer White women who are consorting with non-White men, the better, it all adds to the creeping narrative that Whites are worthless whilst non-Whites are blameless victims. What must warm the cockles of the hearts of girls gang-raped and threatened with death by married Pakistanis is paragraphs like

It’s important to remember that as a white person being sexual with a person of color, you’re in a position of power. The fact that you’re intimate with one another doesn’t erase that. And it can be difficult for a marginalized person to feel comfortable expressing their needs without a safe space being intentionally created by the person of privilege. I’ve written (okay, tweeted) before about how this plays out even in sexual encounters where only a power imbalance exists on the axis of gender. The issue is this: The power dynamics bestowed upon us by our fucked up, oppressive society don’t disappear just because you’re intimate with someone.

See, the real problem with the girls who were victims of Pakistani rape gangs in Telford, Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford and everywhere else where Pakis are allowed to congregate near White women, is that our society is not a safe space in which they can express their needs. In fact, if these diverse and enriching gentlemen were to tell the truth about their much-deserved sexual needs,there are people in the disgusting and unbearable Whiteness of our society who might question, with hate speech reminiscent of Hitler himself probably, these men's right to freely access White girls' vaginas against their will.

The website is also packed with the sort of Social Justice Warrior who makes me particularly angry - East Asian women. There is a ridiculous piece by one of these women about "6 Reasons We Need to Dismantle the Model Minority Myth of 'Those Hard-Working Asians.'" The piece, of course, does nothing to dismantle anything but instead says that this stereotype is a "tool of White supremacy" and that Asians and Blacks need to work together to defeat Whites. I can't work out whether these Asian women are stupid or just evil to write these pieces in terms of whether or not they realise that if "White supremacy" is earning more than another group and being arrested yet then "Asian supremacy" is clearly more than a thing. But they think that because some weeaboos fancy them that this is "oppression."

To bring this back to Taylor Swift, this website also has an article entitled "5 Ways Taylor Swift Exemplifies White Feminism – And Why That’s a Problem." The problem, of course, is that Taylor Swift is White and this fact makes her "problematic". White women need to be led away from feminism, and fast, because feminism is an anti-White movement that is destroying us from inside and out and they are not even trying to hide it anymore. And they should be reminded that, when Whites are gone, so is the altruism so many White women are driven by and love so much.

No comments:

Post a Comment